Archive: December 20, 2009 - December 26, 2009
The Accord takes us some way along a path towards what the world needs - a stretching, binding agreement that will lead to a low carbon future. A very large number of countries, over a hundred, have aligned themselves with the Accord's goals and commitments.
By Nigel Sheinwald | December 24, 2009; 8:58 AM ET | Comments (0)
The Copenhagen negotiations did not yield the fair and binding deal the world hoped for, but once we recover from our disappointment we can begin to build on the foundation the Obama Administration and Congress has laid out for us in 2010.
By Jessy Tolkan | December 23, 2009; 1:35 PM ET | Comments (1)
Developing countries got an empty promise of a lot of money which they probably will never see. Given the governance of many developing countries, whatever money flows their way will probably end up in the pockets of corrupt rulers.
By William O'Keefe | December 23, 2009; 7:18 AM ET | Comments (0)
Through the lens of science -- against the scale of the climate threat and the urgency of action to transform the world's energy systems -- the outcome of the UN negotiations was disappointing indeed.
By Reid Detchon | December 23, 2009; 7:00 AM ET | Comments (0)
The near-empty treaty that emerged from the Copenhagen climate summit shows that promising to cut carbon emissions is a dead-end strategy. There was really little more in the deal than face-saving by world leaders.
By Bjorn Lomborg | December 23, 2009; 6:50 AM ET | Comments (0)
The Copenhagen Accord is neither a continuation of the status quo or a new deal, but a hybrid of the two. Whilst it maintains the core elements of the Kyoto Protocol, it also introduces the United States into the international framework whilst at the same time bringing developing country emissions into the picture in a meaningful way.
By David Hone | December 23, 2009; 6:45 AM ET | Comments (0)