Views and debates on climate change policy
Home | Panelists | Staff Blog | RSS

Lars G. Josefsson
CEO, Vattenfall

Lars G. Josefsson

Lars G. Josefsson is president and CEO of Vattenfall, Europe's fifth largest generator of electricity and the largest generator of heat with operations in Denmark, Finland, Germany, United Kingdom, Poland, Netherlands and Sweden. He is also a member of the UN Secretary-General's Advisory Group on Energy and Climate Change. ALL POSTS

An end to blame-and-shame

Trying to assign blame for the shortcomings of the global negotiations is exactly the wrong approach. The process has for years now been focused on questions of shame and blame, and this is one of the major reasons that progress has been so slow. It is always easier to blame someone else for a problem rather than take the lead on providing solutions. As the Swedish diplomat Jan Eliasson recently pointed out, negotiators are approaching the climate question with a 'win-lose' mentality, when in fact solving climate change is a question of either 'win-win' or 'lose-lose'. The priority has to be the common, long-term benefit, rather than the short-term costs.

A political agreement from COP 15 need not represent a major setback. While a binding treaty may be desirable, the lesson from the Kyoto regime is that it a treaty does not guarantee success. Commitment can come in many forms, and a political agreement based on specific, transparent national strategies coupled to meaningful efforts to collaborate in important areas like technology and trade can still send a meaningful signal.

It is time to take a more practical approach to the political process. Even if a new treaty is signed in 2010, the practical work of implementing policy and technology solutions will not take care of itself. The Copenhagen meeting can provide platform for this practical work, even if the details of every country's reduction and financial commitments are not fixed.

The world is moving in a new direction. The politicians at COP 15 may not be able to describe that journey in detail, but they can give a sense of the speed at which we are going to travel, and they can send a clear signal that there is no turning back.

By Lars G. Josefsson  |  November 18, 2009; 7:58 AM ET Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg     Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: Success is still possible | Next: Learn from Europe

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



Perhaps the Supreme Marshall Plan is necessary to implement the full frontal assault on any and all sources of Co2 pollution without mercy.
Unprecedented cooperation between nations is all there is to have a hope of saving ourselves from ourselves.

Green Energy Marshall Law May Become Necessary if we hope to not choke,toast and roast together in our own waste. I'm told it will smell just like bat dung in a watery cave smells to us today.
What about the Ice test revealing a 20 degree rise in global temperatures in just two years about 12,000 years ago?
Tell me what this means to us.

Posted by: thomascanada | November 21, 2009 6:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company