Views and debates on climate change policy
Home | Panelists | Staff Blog | RSS

Post Carbon

Glacier melt controversy continues

By Juliet Eilperin

A couple of updates on the Himalayan glacier controversy: The U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has apologized for the mistake, and a prominent glacier expert said glaciers there are retreating, but not faster than elsewhere in the world.

In a formal statement on the matter Wednesday, the IPCC said its panel's officials "regret the poor application of well-established IPCC procedures in this instance."

And in a telephone press conference Wednesday afternoon, Lonnie G. Thompson -- a research scientist at the Byrd Polar Research Center at The Ohio State University -- said there is not evidence that Himalayan glaciers are retreating faster than in other areas of the world.

"In the big picture, I would say that's probably not correct," he said.

But Thompson and another high-profile climate scientist, Benjamin D. Santer, research scientist in program for Climate Model Diagnosis and Intercomparison at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, defended the idea that global warming is causing glaciers to melt worldwide.

But the two researchers did acknowledge the 2007 IPCC report's projection of total glacier melt in the Himalayas by 2035 was a mistake, and said other errors may have crept into the landmark scientific assessment.

"Scientists are human, mistakes occur," Santer told reporters. "But science is capable of identifying and correcting these mistakes and moving on."

Myron Ebell, director of energy and global warming policy at the libertarian Competitive Enterprise Institute, said the fact that this error made it into the IPCC report, raises larger questions about the current state of climate science. "The lesson to take away from this is this is not an isolated incident," said Ebell, whose group receives funding from energy companies. "This is a pattern of hyping the evidence to advance the alarmist agenda."

For another climate skeptic's take on the subject, click here.

Still, Thompson said that are gaps in scientists' understanding of glacier melt on the southern slopes of the Himalayas because there are 15,000 glaciers there and they haven't been comprehensively measured. "One of the big problems is the lack of observations in that part of the world."

He added that when it comes to surveys of glaciers on the northern slopes, 95 percent of those surveyed are retreating, which is comparable to other regions of the world.


Juliet Eilperin

 |  January 20, 2010; 3:24 PM ET Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: Sierra Club names its new leader | Next: Murkowski takes aim at EPA


Please report offensive comments below.

What the Washington Post has NOT reported and is at the heart of this issue is how the IPCC "mistake" has led to the enrichment of key climate change advocates. We now know that this "mistake" projecting the total destruction of Himalayan glaciers by year 2035 was used to back up solicitation of funds. The bulk of those funds in the amount of $4M provided by EU taxpayers - went to none other than the IPCC Chair's own research group TERI - to study loss of glaciers in the Himalayas. The remaining portion of funds went to the UK Met Office - the weather prediction center that failed to predict this devastating winter in England.

Why do we readers of this newspaper have to do the homework for its journalists?

Posted by: Thotful | January 27, 2010 8:28 PM
Report Offensive Comment

"...has apologized for the mistake..."

Oh, so it's just yet another "mistake" discoverd in the "scientific" research conducted by global warming hoax community.

How much more evidence do rational people need before its clear this whole thing is nothing but a leftist power grab for money and influence.

Posted by: silencedogoodreturns | January 21, 2010 4:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Post a Comment

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company