The Blue Dog Coalition worries the health bill in the House does not address fundamental cost drivers in the system. Is it possible to rein in costs in the current system? How?
The promise of health reform - providing the best possible care to all Americans - cannot be achieved without reining in cost. But to do so will require a fundamental restructuring of our health care system. We need a paradigm shift.
The unrelenting rise in health care costs is a burden to individual patients, employers, governments and our nation's ability to compete globally. Is it possible to rein in the cost of health care? Yes, but minor changes to the current manner in which we pay for care only perpetuates more of the same - more uncoordinated care at a higher cost. We need change that rewards coordinated care aimed at bringing physicians and hospitals together in the best interest of the patient.
Over the next 90 days, President Obama and the Congressional leaders could embark on a 50-state tour (with stops in the U.S. territories and the District of Columbia, of course) to talk with citizens about the specific sacrifices we all need to make in order to make health-care reform a reality.
Posted by Raymond Martins, on July 24, 2009 12:25 PM
The short answer is no, not until transformational change occurs in the infrastructure of health care delivery. The system today is so broken that, if the infrastructure is fixed and incentives re-aligned, we could deliver twice the health care to twice the people at half the cost but we won't achieve this by simply throwing money at it.
Posted by Colleen Conway-Welch, on July 24, 2009 9:58 AM
As in medicine, we need to cure the disease, not just alleviate its symptoms. To control costs and get to 100 percent coverage, we need to focus on four transformational changes in this order:
The Blue Dog Coalition is probably right. As is, the reform bill does not address cost-containment strategies. The truth is, if we don't deal with these cost drivers now, we'll certainly have to face them in a few years.
The extraordinary growth in domestic health-care spending is a predictable result of our tax policies and the many federal rules forced upon Medicare. If we are going to be serious about making health care more responsible and effective, we need to address these issues first.
Posted by Howard Forman, on July 22, 2009 10:20 AM
Nigerians have a proclivity towards speaking in idioms and proverbs. Here's one time where adopting my mother's penchant for the same can speak volumes: Prevention is better than cure.
Posted by Chisara N. Asomugha, on July 22, 2009 7:29 AM
Truthfully, we will not achieve the perfect health plan, but we owe our countrymen something better than the limited access and skyrocketing costs that plague our current system.
Posted by Chris T. Pernell, on July 21, 2009 6:25 PM
A focus on disease prevention and management, improved technologies and innovative medicines will improve health outcomes and lessen existing health system strains on our economy.
The danger is that Congress will fall back to old habits and make its usual cuts to physician fee schedules, medical education, social programs, etc. The "big ticket" opportunities lie elsewhere.
If someone is very obese and is at risk of getting diabetes, a doctor cannot be reimbursed for helping them lose weight in the Medicare system -- the patient must be diagnosed with a disease first. That's like saying that we wait until the roof leaks and ruins our living room furniture before we repair a hole in the roof.
Posted by Michael Critelli, on July 20, 2009 11:10 PM
If we focus on these few, small steps, I believe that we can truly achieve the giant leaps in health-care transformation we need to remain competitive in the global economy. Like the Apollo program, it's worth taking our time to get it done right the first time around.
Posted by Raymond J. Zastrow, on July 20, 2009 12:01 PM