<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Health Care Rx</title>
<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/</link>
<ttl>15</ttl>
<description>Health Care Rx is a conversation about health care reform from The Washington Post. Keep up-to-date on news about health reform, read experts&apos; views and join the conversation.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:54:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
<generator>http://www.movabletype.org/?v=4.2-en</generator>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 


<item>
<title>What is your final assessment of the bill?</title>
<description>This week, President Obama plans to sign into law a budget &quot;reconciliation&quot; bill that includes the final changes to the new health-care overhaul. What is your assessment of the now-complete health law and its implications for the future?</description>
<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/03/what_is_your_final_assessment_of_the_bill/all.html</link>
<guid>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/03/what_is_your_final_assessment_of_the_bill/all.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 09:54:46 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>What do you think of the revised bill?</title>
<description>House Democrats released their new version of the health bill on March 18. What&apos;s your assessment of the legislation?</description>
<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/03/what_do_you_think_of_the_revised_bill/all.html</link>
<guid>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/03/what_do_you_think_of_the_revised_bill/all.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 10:34:51 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Are insurance companies really to blame?</title>
<description>Last week, President Obama admonished insurance company executives for excessive rate increases. He took aim at them again in his speech in Philadelphia on Monday. How much of our problem rests with insurance companies and how much is the result of other facets of the health-care system?</description>
<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/03/is_everything_insurance_companies_fault/all.html</link>
<guid>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/03/is_everything_insurance_companies_fault/all.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 12:47:27 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>How would you assess President Obama&apos;s merged proposal?</title>
<description>In advance of Thursday&apos;s health-care summit, the White House released its plan for merging comprehensive bills passed last year by the House and Senate. How would you assess President Obama&apos;s proposal and what impact if any will it have on action in Congress?</description>
<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/02/how_would_you_assess_president_obamas_merged_propsal/all.html</link>
<guid>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/02/how_would_you_assess_president_obamas_merged_propsal/all.html</guid>
<category>Congress</category>
<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:23:20 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>What does the Anthem saga tell us about health reform?</title>
<description>In early February, Anthem Blue Cross of California sent out about 700,000 notices to individual health insurance policy holders informing them that their rates were about to jump by up to 39 percent. On Feb. 13, the company called off the rate hike after the move drew criticism from the federal government and the public. What does the recent controversy in California over Anthem&apos;s proposed rate hikes tell us about the need for health reform?</description>
<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/02/what_does_the_anthem_saga_tell_us_about_health_reform/all.html</link>
<guid>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/02/what_does_the_anthem_saga_tell_us_about_health_reform/all.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:14:57 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Starting small: good strategy or political show?</title>
<description>In a Feb. 2 conference call, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi talked about starting small. She indicated she wants the House to vote on elements of health-care reform, such as repeal of McCarran-Ferguson Act, which exempts insurance companies from antitrust laws. Is this a smart strategy or just political show?</description>
<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/02/starting_small_good_strategy_or_political_show/all.html</link>
<guid>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/02/starting_small_good_strategy_or_political_show/all.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 16:03:28 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>The state of health care in the State of the Union?</title>
<description>Do you agree with what President Obama said about health-care reform during his State of the Union speech Jan. 27?</description>
<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/01/state_of_health_care_in_state_of_the_union/all.html</link>
<guid>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/01/state_of_health_care_in_state_of_the_union/all.html</guid>
<category>Health care reform</category>
<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:03:54 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Brown&apos;s win in Mass.: What should Obama and Congress do now?</title>
<description>In light of the Massachusetts voters electing Scott Brown to Edward M. Kennedy&apos;s seat in the U.S. Senate, what should President Obama and Congress do now regarding health-care reform?</description>
<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/01/browns_win_what_should_obama_and_congress_do_now/all.html</link>
<guid>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/01/browns_win_what_should_obama_and_congress_do_now/all.html</guid>
<category>Health care reform</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 09:48:32 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>What happens until 2013?</title>
<description>Even if President Obama signs a comprehensive health-care bill this year, much of it will not take effect until 2013 or later. What do you anticipate will happen in the health-care sector in the intervening years?</description>
<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/01/what_happens_until_2013/all.html</link>
<guid>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/01/what_happens_until_2013/all.html</guid>
<category>Health care reform</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:56:14 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>One year of health-care reform: How&apos;s it going?</title>
<description>It has been nearly a year since Washington officials embarked on an effort to overhaul the nation&apos;s health-care system. How do you assess the situation today?</description>
<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/01/one_year_of_health-care_reform_hows_it_going/all.html</link>
<guid>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2010/01/one_year_of_health-care_reform_hows_it_going/all.html</guid>
<category>Health care reform</category>
<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 09:43:33 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Was it worth compromising to secure 60 votes?</title>
<description>The Senate bill includes special accommodations for certain states and industries. Was it worth including the compromises to secure 60 votes?</description>
<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2009/12/was_it_worth_compromising_to_secure_60_votes/all.html</link>
<guid>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2009/12/was_it_worth_compromising_to_secure_60_votes/all.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:00:13 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Should the Senate have ditched the Medicare buy-in?</title>
<description>Last week, an idea sprung out of the Senate to allow people ages 55 to 64 to buy into Medicare. Do you support the proposed Medicare buy-in? Why or why not?</description>
<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2009/12/do_you_support_the_proposed_medicare_buy-in/all.html</link>
<guid>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2009/12/do_you_support_the_proposed_medicare_buy-in/all.html</guid>
<category>Medicare</category>
<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 12:15:19 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>What can we learn from the mammogram debate?</title>
<description>What does the debate over mammography screening teach us about the challenges in moving to evidence-based medicine in a revamped health system?</description>
<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2009/12/what_can_we_learn_from_the_mammogram_debate/all.html</link>
<guid>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2009/12/what_can_we_learn_from_the_mammogram_debate/all.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:20:10 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>How would you amend Reid&apos;s bill?</title>
<description>The Senate is debating Majority Leader Harry Reid&apos;s bill. How would you amend it?</description>
<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2009/11/reid_connolly/all.html</link>
<guid>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2009/11/reid_connolly/all.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:12:37 -0500</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Is the 2009 deadline necessary or feasible?</title>
<description>President Obama has said he wants to sign health-care legislation by year&apos;s end, but is this deadline necessary or feasible?</description>
<link>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2009/11/deadline_connolly/all.html</link>
<guid>http://views.washingtonpost.com/healthcarerx/2009/11/deadline_connolly/all.html</guid>
<category></category>
<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:28:14 -0500</pubDate>
</item>


</channel>
</rss>
