On Leadership
Video | PostLeadership | FedCoach | | Books | About |
Exploring Leadership in the News with Steven Pearlstein and Raju Narisetti

Guest Insights

From young volunteers to civic leaders

Max Klau
Max Klau is director of leadership development at City Year.

This past September, more than 1,500 young adults began a challenging year of full-time service to the nation as City Year corps members; they will be working in schools in an effort to address the nation's high school-dropout crisis.

Data shows our corps members can have a positive impact on student academic achievement. Equally important, research shows that the corps members themselves will emerge from the experience more likely to vote and volunteer than their peers who did not serve. Still, we in the national-service community ask ourselves: Are we making the most of this opportunity to set these volunteers on the path to a lifetime of civic leadership?

This question has new relevance today. The 2009 Serve America Act will triple the number of participants in AmeriCorps programs from 75,000 per year to 250,000 per year; if all goes as planned, by 2017 there will be a quarter-of-a-million young people doing full-time national service programs every year. That's a lot of young people addressing critical public challenges. Are we making the most of this formative life experience?

As a leadership educator, I'm hopeful. Over the course of 20 years of guiding corps members through a challenging year of service, City Year has accumulated a rich legacy of best practices and thoughtful leadership development efforts. Inspired by our colleagues in the military, we have adapted the U.S. Army's "Be, Know, Do" leadership-development framework to address the demands of civilian service.

Our new, publicly available curriculum, The Idealist's Journey, guides our corps members through a process of reflecting on their sense of purpose and their aspirations for themselves as idealistic leaders (the "Be"). Our training is growing increasingly sophisticated and focused on helping our corps generate measurable, replicable positive changes in student academic achievement (the "Know"). And our service models are growing dramatically more rigorous and intentional (the "Do"). All this work is informed by research, input from thought leaders, and evaluation of our experiences.

While City Year and other organizations have devoted resources to this process of leadership development, I am struck by how little attention the national service context has received elsewhere. During my six years of doctoral work at the Harvard Graduate School of Education and the Kennedy School of Government, I never found a single course that focused on a year of service as a meaningful educational experience. And my experiences representing City Year at leadership conferences have convinced me that the leadership-development world is only just beginning to understand the transformational power of a year of full-time citizen service.

Consider the experiences of our corps members: Like a service-learning program, they work directly to right social wrongs. Like military service, they wear uniforms, work in teams and are dedicated to serving their nation--a cause much greater than themselves. Like a full-time job, they are required to show up on time and put in a full day of work. Like school, they learn about civic institutions, values and history. This multifaceted experience is a unique way of growing leaders.

It is no coincidence that 10 of the last 12 U.S. presidents served in the military. Indeed, many have suggested that their military service set them on the path that led to the White House. In Barack Obama, we have a new twist: A president whose public service roots lie in a community organizing experience he had as a young adult. To be clear, national service and community organizing are not the same thing (community organizing is actually a prohibited activity for our corps members). Yet they are similar in some important ways: Both are long term (i.e. more than a week or a summer), full-time, grass-roots, front-line civilian efforts to address pressing public problems.

Combine the powerful example of Obama's life experience with the dramatically expanded numbers of young adults enrolled in national service programs, and you begin to see the incredible potential these programs possess as pipelines for developing the next generation of influential civic leaders. It's time for those of us interested in the theory and practice of leadership development to give national service the attention it deserves.

By Max Klau

 |  November 9, 2009; 7:20 AM ET |  Category:  Leadership development Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: Corporate lessons from football coaching | Next: The richest leaders, the poorest women


Please email us to report offensive comments.

The debate about whether leadership is intrinsic continues. Working in this area and having witnessed leaders as young as two and as old as 85, I believe that there is a leader inside every single one of us. Not every one wants to be CEO but most people want to live a quality life. In order to do this, key things need to be learnt and enacted. Leadership skills can be learned and then shared.

I love the work I do because I am in the fortunate position to be able to teach people how to be powerful in their role. I see the way it translates to increased business productivity and the ripple effect that it has.

Posted by: IBCoaching | November 12, 2009 2:19 AM

Thanks for posting this! I'm a City Year alum, and I often tell people that City Year had a profound impact on me as a leader. When I entered the program, I had absolutely no concept of myself as a leader, and very little belief that I could lead people effectively.

But what I learned is that "your commitment brings out the commitment in others," and when you stand up for an ideal that you believe in, which is so rare in our society nowadays, you inspire others to act. And that's the true purpose of leadership - to get other people to take their own personal action and to be responsible.

I'm now in graduate school and studying public leadership myself, and I find myself often having a unique perspective quite different than my peers with regard to leadership theory, because of the powerful experiences and challenges that I faced in my two years of service with City Year.

I strongly believe in City Year and am deeply grateful for its impact in helping me realize my true capacity as a leader.

Posted by: GoodKingDavid | November 9, 2009 7:22 PM

1. I believe Junior Achievement, Boy and Girl Scouts of America, Boy and Girl Clubs of America, then, a national Corporate mentorship are the pillars of leadership needed to guide our young people. Since, we have a lawless society pertaining to effective law enforcement of the United States' Constitution. These organization help instill discipline to so our young people operate against the pressures of social confusion.
2. For we are military industrial complex of fellow corporations, however, this structure is not taught to our youth. So they are Catch-22 into a life of crime and social decadence. Our young people must be protected from this social decay with effective leadership foundated by these organization. President Barack Hussein Obama is asked to invest in People Capital (PC) to recovery our national treasury, our young people. Word...

Antonio the Sun

Posted by: sterlinggo1 | November 9, 2009 6:44 PM

Sorry, Floridanco, military service does not confer automatic leadership abilities. In my workplace, the ones who have had military experience are the worst at leading. They forget that you need more than an authoritarian attitude to actually lead.

Leadership is the ability to coordinate the efforts of several different people towards a common goal. Some people have this ability seemingly inborn. Others learn it, most never can. But whenever you see someone spouting pseudo-leadership-speak like "be.know.do" run fast in the other direction. The worst ones are the self-deluded near-nutjobs who have convinced themselves that the training courses they've taken (or given) have anything to do with actual leadership. Some people can learn leadership, but not that way, not ever.

Posted by: bigbrother1 | November 9, 2009 5:07 PM

The young kids should be trined for their future, this is good. But you have a ready-made supply of young leaders no one is recognizing or using. Military Veterans. They are experienced, motivated and trainable right now. Pay them accordingly and use them correctly and you will have a built-in corps of loyal employees. Don't start them at minimum wage, pay them for their leadership abilities which is extensive.

Posted by: floridanco | November 9, 2009 4:31 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company