Adultery Is Private, Politics Are Not

Unlike the French who seem to think it's not worth getting excited about infidelity, we Americans have historically had a somewhat Puritanical attitude toward adultery. However, we have sometimes ignored it in those leaders we value highly, like JFK and Martin Luther King.

When Grover Cleveland ran against James Blaine in 1884, his illegitimate child caused a scandal, but he still won the presidency. The voters considered Cleveland's sexual escapade less damaging than Blaine's crooked financial dealings.

I think that the public dislikes infidelity in its leaders but is willing to ignore it if the leader is seen as truly working for the common good. But if like Sanford and Ensign, politicians who have run on family values and denounced others for their sexual missteps, prove hypocritical, voters will inevitably doubt their honesty and authenticity. Hypocrisy, especially the holier-than-thou variety, is a stronger reason to distrust a politician than adultery, which I believe is a private affair.

By Michael Maccoby

 |  June 29, 2009; 1:44 PM ET
Category:  Ethics
Share This: Technorati | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Previous: Mostly About Sex | Next: Leaders We Can Live Without

Posted by: cjanson | July 1, 2009 10:23 AM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.