Smart leaders compromise
Q: Winning an election often involves taking a strong ideological position to energize a partisan base. Actually governing, however, usually requires compromise. Will today's Republican leaders be able or willing to pivot successfully from campaigning to governing? Are there lessons from other fields on how to do it?
Compromise is not a four-letter word. It is a practical and proven method applied by good leaders in every sector to get things done, and done right.
Therefore it is so disheartening to see compromise being dragged through the mud of what purports to be political discourse. Politicians desperate for cash and voters roundly criticize compromise as somehow being a tool of deceit and an indication of lack of spine. When in reality, compromise is not only a sign of intelligence; it is a sign of strength.
Compromise is the art of seeing another person's point of view and the practice of determining if the other person has something valuable to add to your idea or your initiative. To adopt this view, a leader needs to know him or herself well and feel confident enough to include others in the discussion. People who are insecure lack the wherewithal to look for ideas or support from opponents. Such people are not ready for leadership positions, because their weaknesses prevent them from adopting a wider view.
When we think of such compromise, the example of Abraham Lincoln's management of the Civil War comes to mind. Lincoln was initially viewed as a weak president, but he showed his true strength, as we know from Doris Kearns Goodwin's Team of Rivals, in selecting a cabinet of the best people for the job even though some had opposed, or were actively opposing him. Had Lincoln chosen those who would kowtow to him, the outcome of the Civil War might have been very different.
Compromise is an everyday occurrence in the corporate world. The notion that CEOs lead solely through fiat belies the fact that so many corporate initiatives fail. Success--in the form of an organizational transformation, a new product introduction or operational initiative--occurs when senior leaders engage at all levels to ensure the work gets done right. Augmenting the big idea with the suggestions and willpower of the team ensures the teamwork necessary to bring the project to fruition. Such collaboration only occurs when employees feel they have a say in how they do their work and therefore a stake in the shared outcome.
Not all compromise is possible. Leaders do not compromise on principle. When they do, they get in trouble. The root of the meltdown in the financial services industry was failure to abide by the values of fiscal prudence coupled with policies that enabled companies to assume higher levels of debt. In this instance both principle and policies were compromised for the worse and our economy suffered for it.
Rational leaders will say: "I will not compromise my values for expediency." Take the example of a sales manager who is challenged to increase sales by a big number. One solution might be to push sales people to cut margins or even to pay kickbacks. Such methods may move the sales needle, but do so in ways that would damage the company's reputation. Good business leaders do not compromise values for profits.
Compromise need not begin with big issues. I am reminded of a photograph that hung in the upstairs of a house that I sublet in my senior year at Georgetown more than 30 years ago. The picture, taken at a Congressional golf outing sometime in the Fifties, was of a smiling Richard Nixon in golf attire. As I recall, the inscription on the photo was personalized to the organizer of the outing and read something like: "Never have I seen so many Democrats and Republicans come together in a spirit of friendship and fun. Your friend, Dick Nixon."
Sometimes learning to work together with the opposition begins when rhetoric gives way to simple common courtesy.
October 26, 2010; 9:53 AM ET
Category: Accomplishing Goals , CEOs , Congressional leadership , Government leadership , Leadership development , Leadership weaknesses , Political leadership Save & Share:
Previous: Four questions to ask of Republicans | Next: Defusing our fiscal time bomb
Posted by: vatownsend | October 27, 2010 9:47 AM
Report Offensive Comment
Posted by: Chagasman | October 26, 2010 10:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment