Archive: Public policy
On a global scale, fragile ecological systems may be safer if drilling occurs under US regulations and with US technologies.
By Coro Fellows | May 4, 2010; 12:03 PM ET | Comments (8)
I don't see Gov. Jan Brewer's action as a matter of boldness. It's simply a wrong action.
By Yash Gupta | April 30, 2010; 11:14 AM ET | Comments (67)
Border security is a federal responsibility, and the federal government's non-performance to date has placed an unfair burden on Arizona that its elected leaders are at least trying to address.
By Robert Goodwin | April 29, 2010; 08:49 PM ET | Comments (13)
In my profession, if my superiors are ineffective, action to compensate is a necessity.
By West Point Cadets | April 29, 2010; 02:21 PM ET | Comments (2)
Leading up when you are going against the direction of your senior leaders is risky proposition. Senior executives do not like to be challenged, especially by those they outrank.
By John Baldoni | April 29, 2010; 10:23 AM ET | Comments (2)
Health-care has been an unnecessarily difficult struggle, providing fodder for Obama's opponents as the midterm elections draw nearer.
By Yash Gupta | March 18, 2010; 02:44 PM ET | Comments (2)
Facts are important, but knowing what they mean is priceless. Obama's lowest grade comes in his management of health care's 'meaning.'
By Katherine Tyler Scott | March 18, 2010; 02:29 PM ET | Comments (0)
Our political system, not just our president, has failed to provide a platform for understanding on which we could all gather.
By Alaina Love | March 18, 2010; 11:36 AM ET | Comments (1)
Members from both parties have failed to put the nation's interests above their own political needs or aspirations.
By Scott DeRue | March 18, 2010; 10:47 AM ET | Comments (1)
If Congress does pass health-care reform, the bill's eventual implementation will be fraught with more partisan bickering. That is the price of unclear leadership from the top.
By John Baldoni | March 18, 2010; 10:36 AM ET | Comments (1)
By handing away the leadership to a Senate that lacked bipartisan leaders, Obama lost the momentum he had from his initial popularity.
By Michael Maccoby | March 18, 2010; 06:35 AM ET | Comments (1)
By aiming for unrealistic goals like bi-partisanship, Obama's initiative was more susceptible to failure and delays.
By Coro Fellows | March 18, 2010; 01:58 AM ET | Comments (4)
Mass popular support will be crucial to passing health care reform legislation, so the administration and its supporters should be mobilizing a broad range of nonprofits and constituencies to exert pressure on the legislators.
By Pablo Eisenberg | March 5, 2009; 10:03 AM ET | Comments (0)
A framework of broad principles, as President Obama has proposed, is good but the real issue is the willingness of stakeholders to address the toughest trade-off: containing costs versus expanding coverage.
By Patricia McGinnis | March 5, 2009; 09:47 AM ET | Comments (0)
In government, with the possible exception of the military during combat, decisions are not made, they are negotiated.
By Norm R. Augustine | March 4, 2009; 12:23 PM ET | Comments (5)
The last time an administration tried to fundamentally change health care policy they gathered a group of very bight people, spent months is closed-door conversations, and produced a well-reasoned plan. It failed, and here's how to avoid those pitfalls.
By Jim Kouzes | March 3, 2009; 11:37 AM ET | Comments (1)
The Obama administration is right in inviting stakeholders to take part in the reform process, but it must remain true to five interrelated principles.
By Michael Maccoby | March 2, 2009; 04:30 PM ET | Comments (0)
Knowing that, as military leaders say, "no plan survives contact with the enemy," President Obama should still plan thoroughly -- and, for the moment, keep his cards to his chest.
By Gen. Monty Meigs (Ret.) | March 2, 2009; 04:22 PM ET | Comments (0)
Just as JFK could convince a janitor to work toward putting a man on the moon, so Obama must define health care reform as an important challenge.
By Yash Gupta | March 2, 2009; 04:16 PM ET | Comments (0)
President Obama needs to do the tasks he can do -- like lay out general principles -- and delegate the rest to others, who are probably hungry for the responsibility.
By Roger Martin | March 2, 2009; 04:04 PM ET | Comments (0)
There is no formula for getting the job done: It's as much about personalities as it is about principles, as much about close-to-the-ground politics as it is about high-minded policy prescriptions.
By Alan M. Webber | March 2, 2009; 03:53 PM ET | Comments (0)
Like Clinton and Carter before him, Obama faces an enormous challenge in overhauling health care, but he also has what they didn't have: broad consensus among key congressional players.
By Benjamin W. Heineman, Jr. | March 2, 2009; 03:34 PM ET | Comments (0)
On ambitious proposals like this, leaders who do all the work for everyone, laying out a detailed plan, become easy targets for criticism, like the Clintons did. Better to step back and let others craft the details.
By Marty Linsky | March 2, 2009; 12:00 PM ET | Comments (0)
President Obama can not, on his own, do very much about health care reform. Involving congressional decision-makers -- thereby coopting them and building support -- may be his best, and only, strategy in this case.
By Jeffrey Pfeffer | March 2, 2009; 11:49 AM ET | Comments (1)
Congress is going to have to approve whatever plan he suggests. Why not skip ahead and get them involved in the development of the plan?
By Marshall Goldsmith | March 2, 2009; 11:35 AM ET | Comments (0)
President Obama is wisely setting forth the principles of his health care plan rather than the details and then having the patience to work out the details with the right congressional committees.
By Bill George | March 2, 2009; 11:31 AM ET | Comments (0)
President Obama seems to realize what Bill Clinton did not: that Congress will write any new laws, and that his job is to spell out the grand idea.
By Mickey Edwards | March 2, 2009; 11:06 AM ET | Comments (0)
President Obama should launch a public campaign pushing the outlines of the plan, work closely with legislators on the details -- and listen to everyone's responses.
By Abraham Zaleznik | March 2, 2009; 10:59 AM ET | Comments (0)
We should not expand health care coverage until we have meaningfully reduced health care costs and the tens of trillions of existing unfunded federal health care promises. We must not shoot ourselves again!
By David Walker | March 2, 2009; 10:54 AM ET | Comments (1)
The president is most effective when he lays out general principles and places specific plans and priorities within them. Too many details at this point are likely to cause disengagement on the part of the public and quibbling on the part of the Beltway partisans.
By Howard Gardner | March 2, 2009; 10:46 AM ET | Comments (0)