Is Obama's oil spill response too little, too late?
By
Cameron Smith
|
May 27, 2010; 1:27 PM ET
| Category:
National
Save & Share:
Previous: How long could you last offline? |
Next: How much would you pay to see Stephen Strasburg's debut?
Posted by: Cornell1984 | May 27, 2010 2:26 PM
WaPo polls are always and I do mean always stupid/inane (choose your own word). Why I bother to look at them probably says I need to get back to work:).
Posted by: jlr6111 | May 27, 2010 2:30 PM
This is the first poll I've looked at. I won't be looking at them again - because the comments are so poor.
Posted by: BrightSky9 | May 27, 2010 6:29 PM
Uh, have you two read any "polls" at any other news website? They are all framed just as inanely.
If you don't like WaPo pick another reason.
Posted by: CCCinNaptown | May 27, 2010 7:04 PM
Yes, please take another six months to assess the environmental impact of building barriers to keep the oil away from the marshes of Louisiana. You're just in time.
Posted by: kls1 | May 27, 2010 9:32 PM
This is BPs problem to fix.
Posted by: jckdoors | June 1, 2010 3:45 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.
The questions does not go with the poll. The complete idiots at the Post show their utter illiteracy.
What does yes mean? A step in the right direction? or he should have been aggressive much earlier?
On the WaPooP would have a poll that is heads Obama wins, Tails you lose.