Post User Polls

Do you agree with the court's ruling in the Pa. immigration case?

A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that Hazleton, Pa., may not enforce its crackdown on illegal immigrants, dealing another blow to 4-year-old regulations that inspired similar measures around the country. The city's mayor pledged to take the case to the Supreme Court. Read the full story.

By Abha Bhattarai  |  September 9, 2010; 7:34 PM ET  | Category:  National Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: What should happen to government workers who owe overdue taxes? | Next: Should Mexico's drug wars affect U.S. laws on marijuana use?

Comments

Please email us to report offensive comments.



The Federal government SHOULD be the entity enforcing the immigration laws, but since they are not and certain individual states are being overwhelmed due to the ineffective Federal response, I can see why states would seek to tackle the problem themselves. If nothing else, it makes the Obama administration respond by talking about the problem (if only he would really do something about it!)

Posted by: Georgetowner1 | September 9, 2010 8:17 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company