Main Page | About | The Contestants | Rules | RSS Feed
You have an opinion, but do you have what it takes to be heard?

Judges' Blog

Do our contestants have a second act?

By Fred Hiatt, editorial page editor

 

Okay, I have to say I think Marisa is way too hard on Mara Gay here. One of the questions in a contest like this is whether someone who writes a first good entry can do more -- is there a second act? And I think this column shows that for Gay, there definitely is -- and I'd guess a third and fourth act, too, if she gets the chance.

 

What's good about this column? It's got a great opening sentence, for one thing. With that little twist on a cliche, we know whom Mara is talking about and the theme of her oped, and we want to know more. We know also that she's going to be critical of, or at least disappointed in, Michelle Obama so far -- but the first two words ("For now") suggest this isn't going to be a screed.

 

Then, I think Gay does a good job in the rest of the column of marrying the political to the personal. Her description of her evolving feelings about Clinton and Palin, and her continuing hopes for Michelle Obama, give the reader a good understanding of the complexities of this subject in the 21st century -- and help us feel like we're beginning to know Mara.

My biggest complaint is that she goes on too long. If I'd been her editor, I would have suggested ending the piece right here:

 

I hope she's right. In the meantime, American women of my generation are left to question why "mom in chief" is the most celebrated role for women in American politics.

In column writing, coming up with the right last sentence can be almost as hard as writing the first.

 
As for Darryl Jackson, I'm afraid I'm more in agreement with Marisa. Nothing wrong with choosing a familiar topic, but then you have to do something unfamiliar with it. This piece spends too much time rehashing stuff we all know already. It starts out with a Reagan comparison, but then doesn't follow through on the analogy: Jackson's point on Reagan is that he was a political thinker of substance even before running for president, though people didn't give him credit for that. So, is the same true of Palin? Jackson doesn't make the case.

By

Fred Hiatt

 |  November 2, 2009; 11:06 AM ET  |  Category:  Darryl Jackson critiques , Judge: Fred Hiatt , Mara Gay critiques , round one
Share: Email a Friend | Technorati talk bubble Technorati | Del.icio.us | Digg | Facebook
Previous: Gay and Jackson tread familiar ground | Next: These columns lost me

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



I guess I just feel that the judges of this contest ought to reveal their ages. As you--ahem--required your contestants to do. Who is the audience for Mara Gay's writing?
It isn't me, although I read and enjoyed her first two efforts. Although there is a case to be made for those experienced in writing and marketing to judge, the real test of Mara's writing is how those in her particular marketing segment respond. So as a reader, and as a contestant who was not chosen but who DID revel her age, I respectfully(or not) submit, that what the judges are saying here would be more valuable as an assessment if we knew (about?) how old they are....

Posted by: martymar123 | November 2, 2009 12:54 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2009 The Washington Post Company