The League

THE QUESTION

Plaxico: Good Riddance?

Are the New York Giants better off without Plaxico Burress?

Posted by Emil Steiner on December 1, 2008 7:00 AM
FROM THE PANEL

Dump Him Now

I would say absolutely they're better off without him.

Posted by Randy Cross, on December 1, 2008 3:42 PM

Who Else Will Be Affected?

The most harrowing thing for the Giants is that Plaxico Burress's behavior put not only his NFL future in jeopardy, but Antonio Pierce's as well.

Posted by Mark Maske, on December 1, 2008 1:20 PM

Bye Plax

Have you seen anything that would indicate they're not?

Posted by David Aldridge, on December 1, 2008 7:17 AM

Mr. Big Shot

How hard is it to spend the night with your wife and baby boy without getting a temporary restraining order?

Posted by Zach Leibowitz, on December 1, 2008 7:15 AM

Giants Must Cut Bait

It's come to the point where the on-field Plax doesn't make up for the off-field Plax anymore.

Posted by Doug Farrar, on December 1, 2008 7:14 AM

FEATURED COMMENTS

PTBaby: Rich athlete + night club + gun = good clean fun for all. So are the Giants better off without Plax in the locker room? Maybe, but it's lot ...

delOH: Yes, the Giants are better off. He messed up bad this time. Don't drop the soap Plax!...

nerraw00: Giants must cut him. They can probably even get a couple of draft picks from Dallas as he would make a nice fit down there. He would even be...

Make a Comment  |  All Comments (26)

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company