The League


Vick or Bonds: Who's Worse for PR?

One's a convicted dog fighter, the other was indicted in the biggest baseball scandal since the Black Sox. Both are looking to play next season, but who would be a bigger liability to a prospective team's image?

Posted by Emil Steiner on March 4, 2009 3:26 AM

Vick Doesn't Deserve a Second Chance

There has to be something so vile in the character of someone who would support such an operation that we have wonder if it is worth having that person involved in the sport we love.

Posted by Doug Farrar, on March 4, 2009 9:59 AM

Vick's a Tougher Sell

NFL fans want to win. But I'm not sure how many NFL fans want their team to be the one that pays Vick a king's ransom to lineup under center.

Posted by Dan Levy, on March 4, 2009 9:07 AM

Risky Bonds Investment

Let's see, admitted dog-abuser and convicted felon or alleged steroid cheat and ultimate baseball fraud?

Posted by Zach Leibowitz, on March 4, 2009 7:27 AM

Vick, Clearly?

Vick's younger -- his transgressions hurt dogs, not his sport.

Posted by Peter Schaffer, on March 4, 2009 3:32 AM

Vick or Bonds?

Michael Vick or Barry Bonds, you decide...

Posted by Reader Poll, on March 4, 2009 3:28 AM

March 4th Winner: DCScribe1

Matt Cassel now stands in the shadow of Scott Mitchell -- free agency winner/incumbent franchise savior. Lucky for Cassel he isn't headed to Detroit.

Posted by TOP COMMENTER, on March 4, 2009 3:27 AM


margiepaul88: I know some of you hate hearing this, but what Vick did, while illegal here, is hardly a crime against humanity. It was a crime against dogs...

rmattocks: What A Stupid Question to ask really. I mean one has done federal prison time for running and bankrolling a multi-state dogfighting operati...

shipfreakbo214: Vicks is a convicted felon, case closed on him. If Bonds is convicted he should do time in prison. We have one comment that said it was only...

Make a Comment  |  All Comments (19)

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company