The League


How Have Drugs Changed Fandom?

When high profile players test positive for performance enhancing drugs how does it affect the fans?

Posted by Emil Steiner on May 7, 2009 1:28 PM

Too Much Pass Interference

Why not just have the college rule, where the penalty for DPI is either 15 yards from the line of scrimmage, or a spot foul for plays that are less than 15 yards.

Posted by Doug Farrar, on May 11, 2009 12:10 PM

Little Reason to Believe

Another neat redemption narrative has been ruined by chemical analysis: Manny Ramírez tested positive for a banned substance.

Posted by Sally Jenkins, on May 8, 2009 2:09 AM

MLB Steps Up

Of course, if this were a linebacker in San Diego in the NFL, he'd just get a four-game suspension, make the Pro Bowl and everybody would shrug.

Posted by Tom Boswell, on May 7, 2009 5:55 PM

If a tree falls...

Shock and disgust has devolved into "so what?" and "who's next?"

Posted by Jim McCormick, on May 7, 2009 2:56 PM

Should We Be Surprised?

At this point, positive tests really don't affect my perception of sports at all - I had assumed for years that almost everyone in baseball was juicing.

Posted by Doug Farrar, on May 7, 2009 2:10 PM

Produce and It's Forgiven

These days, it seems fans are much more forgiving of a player embroiled in the steroids mess so long as he performs at a high level.

Posted by Gene Wang, on May 7, 2009 1:48 PM


jerkhoff: Get over it, fans. Legalize steroids and be done with it. The current witch hunt is sheer foolishness. Twenty years from now we will all ...

delOH: I agree with Doug's opinion. Additionally, it almost seems the media overlooks, for example, a guy like L.T. who admitted to cocaine use to ...

Grandblvd03: Steroid use no longer matters to the fans. If it did, the fans would boycott games. They don't. Legalize steroids and make the playing field...

Make a Comment  |  All Comments (15)

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company