The League


Parity or poor play?

For the first time since 1970, no NFL team reached 4-0 to start the season. Is this a case extreme parity or just poor play from the league's top teams? And is this development good or bad for the NFL?

Posted by Matt Brooks on October 12, 2010 8:00 AM

Is this much parity good for the NFL?

Is this much early season parity good for the NFL?

Posted by Reader Poll, on October 12, 2010 12:04 PM

Pop the cork in South Beach

No team will be running the table in 2010, and that's good news for the NFL, its fans and the upcoming labor negotiations. Maybe all this parity will smack some sense into the powers contemplating a lockout.

Posted by Leonard Shapiro, on October 12, 2010 11:50 AM

Parity reigns supreme

Parity reigns supreme in the NFL and if you're a general football fan, you're mighty happy about it.

Posted by Anthony Stalter, on October 12, 2010 11:35 AM

Vulnerabilities abound

This type of competitive balance keeps more teams -- and their fans -- believing a Super Bowl run is a possibility. And that's exactly what the NFL wants to see.

Posted by Doug Farrar, on October 12, 2010 8:15 AM

Jumping to conclusions

It's far too early to accurately asses the quality of play and the quality of teams in the NFL this season. Defensive struggles may not appeal to everyone, but it remains a formula for success.

Posted by Dave Goldberg, on October 12, 2010 8:00 AM


Make a Comment  |  All Comments (0)

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company