NFC West worse
CLICK TO REACT
I think it would be a pretty hard argument to make that the NFC East is the worst division in football. It certainly isn't the best like it maybe was in years passed, but the simple fact is that three of the four teams are at least two games over .500. Only one other division in the league has three teams over .500.
Looking at that fact, top to bottom you'd have to say the NFC East is still among the best. What the division doesn't have, which it has in the past, is a real dominant team. The Eagles, Giants, & Cowboys are all above average teams but none are dominant. So does that mean the NFC South who has one great team and a bunch of bad or mediocre teams is a better overall division? I suppose that's a matter of opinion. I don't think it's a matter of opinion whether the NFC East is the worst division in football. It's not. As of right now I believe the NFC East would be sending three teams to the playoffs.
The worst division in football this year is the same one it's been for several years. The NFC West.
November 23, 2009; 11:55 AM ET
New York Giants
Save & Share:
Previous: Are you kidding? | Next: Eastern let down
Please email us to report offensive comments.
Posted by: KevinShinn | November 24, 2009 11:27 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.