The League

Tim McHale
Texans Blogger

Tim McHale

The editor-in-chief of SB Nation's site for all things Houston Texans, the aptly named Battle Red Blog.

Straightforward and sufficient


The NFL's policy on performance-enhancing drugs is straightforward: The first failed test results in a four-game suspension, and the second failed test results in suspension for an entire season. Aside from the negative publicity that surrounds a failed test and the loss of endorsements that could accompany same, the aforementioned suspensions undoubtedly affect a player's bottom line; many contracts, including Brian Cushing's, contain escalator clauses that as a practical matter can't be triggered if a player misses too many snaps.

Is that enough to discourage players from using PEDs? I think so. The average NFL career lasts only 3.5 seasons; therefore, for the average player, missing a quarter of a season or a full season is disastrous to both reputation and career earnings. Granted, the prospect of losing four games or an entire season may not be nearly as daunting for an All-Pro (who figures to play for far more than the 3.5 seasons, health permitting), or a fringe player simply trying to hang on for one more year. Those instances, however, are the outliers. For the overwhelming number of NFL players, the consequences of violating the NFL's PED policy should be a suitable deterrent to utilizing banned substances.

By Tim McHale  |  May 28, 2010; 12:00 AM ET  | Category:  NFL , NFL Rules , Roger Goodell , Steroids Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: All about perspective | Next: All about perspective

The comments to this entry are closed.

RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2011 The Washington Post Company