Not Just Another Sorry, No-Account Sports Blog
Home | What Is This? | Columns and Chats | PTI | RSS Feed

In Wilbon's World

Forget medal count, Canada is true winner

Americans can try to claim, if some of us must, some sort of winter Olympic superiority because the U.S. team won more medals than any other nation; there's nothing we love like counts and totals that say we, Americans, are better than everybody else at something, anything. But the stories that mattered most, the victories that mattered most in Vancouver belonged to Canada.

Canada's gold medal victory in hockey over the U.S. Sunday afternoon wasn't only the headliner there, it was the marquee event here as well, and it deserved to be. Canada won the most skilled, most artistic, most passionately played hockey tournament on earth. They had to recover from what could have been a crushing early loss to the U.S. They withstood incomparable pressure, playing in the sport that matters most to the country, on home ice, with the best team, facing preposterously high expectations. No matter how many television hours and column inches in newspapers were devoted to ice skating, don't for one second think that mattered more than the hockey gold medal game, which was watched by approximately 27 million people here and approximately 16.6 million in Canada, which has a total population of 33 million. More than 26 million in Canada, or 80 percent, watched at least a portion of the game.

The second most emotional performance was also turned in by a Canadian, a young woman named Joannie Rochette who won bronze days after her mother died of a heart attack. Please, don't tell me the U.S. winning some mass medal count winds up being a bigger story than Rochette, whose drama ought to be appreciated regardless of culture or language.

The great thing about being at the Winter Games as a sportswriter, instead of watching them on television, is the ability to follow stories based on their value to the overall and not just the Americans. The U.S. teams, and not just the big stars, performed admirably in most cases. But nine gold medals for a country of 304 million people isn't nearly as impressive as Canada's 14 gold medals in a country of 33 million. And neither is close to Norway's nine gold medals (26 total) in a country of 4.6 million people. The Olympic experience ought not be reduced exclusively to a medal count, which is what media and fans have done.

By

Michael Wilbon

 |  March 1, 2010; 8:23 PM ET  |  Category:  Olympics Save & Share:  Send E-mail   Facebook   Twitter   Digg   Yahoo Buzz   Del.icio.us   StumbleUpon   Technorati  
Previous: Ovechkin needs to be checked | Next: Up close with the Caps

Comments

Please report offensive comments below.



"Wilbon, why do you hate America so much?"

Because he hates America's capital.

Posted by: redskinsux | March 5, 2010 2:54 AM
Report Offensive Comment

When did Mike Milbury take over Mike Wilbon's blog.

Posted by: nfb987 | March 3, 2010 12:26 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Taking away from the United States' success simply due to its population is ludicrous. Looking at solely a country's population in contrast to its medal count in determining Olympic success isn't smart. Looking at expectations, culture, and resources is the key.

The U.S. just won the most medals ever by one country in the Winter Olympics. For anybody to take away from that, much less an American, seems harsh.

The past 2 Wilbon blogs have been biased and unfair, and have read more like persuasive blogs than anything else (pro-Crosby and pro-Canada). What's going on, Wilbon? And yes, i'd be saying the same thing if the past 2 blogs were pro-Ovechkin and pro-United States.

Posted by: jdwood84 | March 3, 2010 10:02 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Mike,

It was a shame you couldnt make it here to Vancouver. Although you have been to other Olympics, I think this one would have truly surprised you. The positive energy here was spectacular as I'm sure your fellow journalists would have attest. With Vancouver being your favourite North American city I think this incredible event would have left you in amazement. And the weather was nice too!

Posted by: gridironkid | March 3, 2010 12:24 AM
Report Offensive Comment

it is very impressive that Canada has 14 people who are the BEST in the world at their winter sport while the US has 9.

Posted by: Rpal | March 2, 2010 8:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

NIce article. Its not often we Americans can look at ourselves objectively and see we are not the heroes of every story. If you consider that the US has more population than Canada, Germany, Norway, Sweden, and pretty much all of Europe COMBINED, then the medal count isn't all that impressive. A little humility goes a LONG LONG way. Maybe one day this country will learn that...

Posted by: Rpal | March 2, 2010 8:48 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Wilbon, why do you hate America so much?

Posted by: Poopy_McPoop | March 2, 2010 5:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I still think they should weigh the medals by their value for the final count, much like Epyx did for those of you old enough to remember the Summer and Winter Games they released in the 80s. 5 pts for Gold, 3 for Silver and 1 for Bronze.

So the US 9 gold, 15 silver and 13 silver works out to 45 + 45 + 13 for 103.

Germany had 10, 13 and 7 which works out to 50 + 39 + 7 for 96.

Canada had 14, 7 and 5 which works out to 70 + 21 + 5, so they would tie the Germans.

Golds, then silvers should be the tiebreaker. If they completely tie, then a tie it is. In this case, the Canadians would be second overall.

Posted by: drweidner1 | March 2, 2010 4:34 PM
Report Offensive Comment

First, let me begin by saying I truly respect Wilbon. Having said that, it seems that every time he writes about something other than football, basketball, and golf it is in a negative context. Maybe it is my imagination but I truly cannot recall recent positive comments from him if the subject was the Olympics, hockey, soccer, or baseball.

Posted by: Gambrills4 | March 2, 2010 4:05 PM
Report Offensive Comment

KOLBKL,

You make a fair point but Crofton's point is more relevant. Of the 37 medals earned in Vancouver, only 15 were in sports that did not exist in Calgary. 22 medals is still nearly three times as many as the 6 that were won in Calgary. Further, of the six medals earned in Calgary three were in speed skating and three were in figure skating so in every other sport the USA came away empty handed. USA was once a minor player within the Winter Olympic scene and they are now a major player as Crofton pointed out.


Posted by: blackandred777 | March 2, 2010 3:51 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Crofton, you can't compare 1988 to 2010. How many of those medals that we won in Vancouver were in sports that weren't around in 1988? Or how about this: delete any Short Track Speed Skating and 'Extreme' sports from the 2010 count.

I agree that the efforts in comparable sports are ten-fold if not more in the Nordic and sledding sports. But I think folks can't lump Olympics together but instead must look at each sport individually for improvement.

Posted by: kolbkl | March 2, 2010 1:36 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I concur w/ Wilbon, it is hardly relevant to maintain "records" of medal counts anyway. This Winter Olympiad featured nearly double the number of events from 1988, so this count will continue to inflate.

Posted by: frustrated5 | March 2, 2010 12:43 PM
Report Offensive Comment

Definitely agree on the existence of the attitude of wanting to put US at the top of the table whenever possible. That is truly what our essence is. The Spanish channel, for example, had Canada at the top and listed the rest by number of gold medals.

I would disagree, though, in your view that gold medals ALONE per the number of people in the country is an accurate measure of how well a country performed in the Olympics. Russia, for instance, was unhappy with its performance in these Olympics, but they don't compete very well in the ALL of the events. It takes a lot more than 4 years for these training programs to develop. You can't tell me that we should expect to be as good at long distance speed-skating as Holland or as good at cross country skiing as Norway (The Nordic combined medal was awesome, I thought). So, to be one of the top three in the world in 30-some events should not be overlooked. No other country achieved the same feat, in that respect. The greatness of that, I will leave to someone else to decide

Posted by: moo21 | March 2, 2010 12:40 PM
Report Offensive Comment

I've got to agree with Wilbon on this one. Medal count is great, but will the sporting world really remember the Olympics when the US asserted newfound skills in the Nordic combined? Probably not.

Is there an American athlete for the ages who emerged out of these games? Unless you are among the five or six people not sick to death of Lindsay Vonn, or are overly impressed by that husky guy in the bobsled, there's no Peggy Fleming in 2010.

When we think back to 2010, I think and hope that we will remember the truly transcendent moments, like the two Wilbon cited, and not a medal count.

Posted by: TheBoreaucrat | March 2, 2010 11:09 AM
Report Offensive Comment

Hi I'm Michael Wilbon. I'm controversial. I'm the hardcore counter-punch to Kornheiser's attempts at humor. Being so pessimistic at this stage of my career will keep me fresh and relevant.

USA? Just not good enough. Ovechkin? Just not good enough. Sydney Crosby? Just can't promote that guy enough and in the Capitals' hometown newspaper no less.

Aren't you so very mad at me right now?

Posted by: matthere1 | March 2, 2010 9:40 AM
Report Offensive Comment

A little perspective here please. I completely agree about the amazing number of gold medals Canada won. However, it is ridiculous to discount the total number of medals won by the USA in these Olympic games. The 37 medals won is a Winter Olympic record so it cannot be discounted. In addition, the last time the Winter Olympics were held in Canada (1988) the USA won six medals, SIX MEDALS! Let's give some credit to Team USA for an amazing rise in just two decades. They are now competitive in events that were an afterthought twenty years ago (Nordic Combined, Bobsled, etc). USA has transformed from a Summer Olympic power to a Winter & Summer Olympic power.

Posted by: croftonpost | March 1, 2010 11:50 PM
Report Offensive Comment

The comments to this entry are closed.

 
RSS Feed
Subscribe to The Post

© 2010 The Washington Post Company